This is a reworking of an essay I wrote back in 2014. I feel as strongly about it now as I did then–in fact, I often share this concept when counseling parents. I hope you find this update helpful…
Somehow, most of us grew up with the idea that when it comes to disciplining our kids, we must implement immediate consequences. Except in the case of toddlers, I totally disagree!
The concept of immediate consequences aligns with the behavior modification approaches taught in psychology. BF Skinner effectively trained rats this way, using immediate consequences and rewards as part of what is called operant conditioning.
But kids aren’t rats! Think about how children’s brains are vastly different from those of animals! Kids are capable of reflecting on the past, anticipating what may happen in the future, and utilizing reason–things that rats just can’t do. These capabilities are unique to humans who are made in the image of God. With kids, I’ve found that immediate consequences with kids may indeed modify behavior, but negatively so–and not in the ways we intend.
Let’s say your kid…
- destroys his sister’s favorite toy
- or throws something in anger and breaks your TV
- or comes in a half hour late from curfew
- or has alcohol on his breath.
Would an immediate consequence be helpful in these cases? I say no.
Here are four reasons why using immediate consequences backfires.
- Our lack of objectivity. First of all, we are implementing a consequence at a time when we (the consequence-givers) are likely red-hot with anger. The chances of us thinking objectively at this point is remote; we are likely in “fight-or-fight” mode, flooded with emotion. In moments like this, we tend to be unreasonably harsh, impulsively implementing quick punishments (intended to inflict discomfort on the kid) rather than thoughtful, corrective discipline (intended to help the kid learn and grow).
- The kid’s perception of us. If we appear visibly steamed while imposing a consequence, the child perceives that the consequence was motivated by our anger rather than reasonableness, concern, and care. Regardless of what we actually say, what the kid will hear is this: “Son, you just made us really mad, so now we’re going to respond in a way that makes you just as mad.” Such a perception diverts the kid’s attention away from the actual problem (his behavior), to a something else (our hot-headedness). He will conclude that our behavior is the problem rather than his.
- The kid’s lack of objectivity. We’d be putting a consequence in place at a time when our kid (the consequence-receiver) is also in fight-or-flight mode due to him or her being caught-in-the-act. The kid will likely be flooded with his or her own negative emotions–embarrassment, guilt, defensiveness, anger, etc. In such a condition, he or she wouldn’t be able to listen well or think objectively, so it would be fruitless to enact a consequence at that moment. Once everyone had calmed down, everyone would be better able think clearly and understand what the kid did wrong and what would make things right.
- Our isolation. Lastly, immediate consequences force us to make a quick, impulsive, knee-jerk, on-the-fly reactions without any outside help. Other parents and parenting experts could offer us a wealth of wisdom, but that is not available when we impulsive lay down the law in the heat of the moment. For parents who are married, waiting would allow both parents to decide together what a reasonable consequence would be. Parents can then present the consequence to the kids as a unified team, preventing kids from playing parents against each other (i.e., “good cop/bad cop”).
So Immediate Consequences are to be avoided. But what is the alternative?
Here’s my solution:
Immediate Acknowledgement with Delayed Consequences.
This two-step formula is simple:
- Acknowledge that some unacceptable behavior just occurred.
- Buy yourself some time by informing the child that a consequence will be needed, but you’ll need time to think about what consequence would be best.
Here are some examples of how this might sound in the moment when the misbehavior has occurred.
- “Billy, the way you just spoke to me felt very disrespectful and I’m not ok with that. Something needs to be done about this and I’m going to take some time to figure out what to do about it. I’ll talk to your dad and some friends to get their input and when we’ve reached our decision we’ll get back to you about how it will be handled.”
- “Sally, your reckless driving caused damage to my car and the bumper is obviously going to need to be replaced. I’m pretty angry right now, but I’m going give myself some time to cool off and talk to some other parents and then I will figure out what would be the appropriate way to handle this with you. As soon as I figure it out I’ll get back to you.”
- “Jane, you told us you’d be home at 11 pm and it’s now 12:15 when you’re walking in the door. We’ve been anxious and scared for the past hour and we’re honestly pretty steamed right now. We’re not in a good place to make decisions about this right now so we’re going to need some time to figure out what to do. We’re glad you’re safe and we love you, but right now it would be best for us all to go straight to bed. We’ll talk about this tomorrow.”
MY STORY.
I’d like to share a story where I profoundly experienced the value of “Immediate Acknowledgement with a Delayed Consequence.” It happened many years ago when I was a youth pastor. One night during youth group, I was informed of the misbehavior of a couple of students who had been caught sneaking away from the group. I pulled them aside afterward, and explained how their behavior was entirely unacceptable, but that I was unsure how best to respond. There would be a consequence, I told them, but I needed to think if over to make sure it was fair to them. I told them I’d get back to them as soon as I figured out what to do. A day or so later, I got a beautiful FB message from one of the kids, sincerely apologizing for what they had put me through. They explained that they had talked together about their misbehavior and they both wanted me to know how this situation had opened up their eyes to their sinfulness. They humbly expressed their commitment for it to never happen again. Wow! Problem solved!
As the example above shows, an added benefit of delaying the consequences is that it gives the kids time to wrestle with their behavior, and sometimes, they end up solving their problem themselves! In this case, the kids really didn’t need me to impose consequences on them at all– their expressions of remorse demonstrated that they had learned from their mistake and their apology mended our strained relationship. In fact, this whole incident actually brought us closer–a bond that continued through the rest of their high school years!
- So the added blessing of delayed consequences is this: during the time-lapse between Step 1: Acknowledgement and Step 2: Delayed Consequences, sometimes the kids do some good thinking on their own and take responsibility to solve their own problems.
AN ALTERNATE ENDING TO MY STORY.
Imagine how different things would have ended had I imposed an immediate consequence on those high school kids:
Hot-Headed Mark: “I’m so furious with you two! Shame on you! You embarrassed me by sneaking off and misbehaving during youth group. I expected more from you two–you’re supposed to be leaders! You’ve broken my trust and that’s going to be really hard to regain. I’m going to teach you a lesson you’ll never forget: effective immediately, you’re both grounded from youth group for a month! But just know that when you come back–I’ll be watching you!
What would their reaction be? “That Mark Forstrom is such a jerk! He’s so judgmental. He doesn’t care about us. He only cares about himself and just wants to control us all the time. Fine, he can go ahead and kick us out of his stupid youth group. We don’t want to come anymore anyway! ”
In that scenario, rather than bonding with them, my our relationship would have been severed.
Case made!
So unless you have an animal or a toddler, let’s be careful to avoid immediate consequences and implement delayed consequences instead!